Skip to Content

HOWITZ, F.G.

Om Afsindighed og Tilregnelse, et Bidrag til Psychologien og Retslæren. - [DEDIKATIONSEKSEMPLAR AF VÆRKET, DER INDLEDTE STRIDEN OM VILJENS FRIHED.]

Herman H. J. Lynge & Søn A/S
lyn61898
Kjøbenhavn, A. Seidelin, 1824. 8vo. Indbundet i et pænt, samtidigt halvlæderbind med enkel rygforgyldning og forgyldt titeletiket på ryg. Øvre kapitæl og ydre false med slid. Kantslid. Hjørner stødte. Med egenhændig dedikation fra forfatteren på forsatsbladet. Trykt på skrivepapir. Ren og pæn indvendig. (4),VIII,117,(1: errata) pp.

Et nydeligt dedikationseksemplar af den sjældne originaludgave af Howitz' vigtigste skrift, - værket, der indledte den danske strid om viljens frihed, den såkaldte Howitz-fejde."Med afhandlingen "Om Afsindighed og Tilregnelse, et Bidrag til Psykologien og Retslæren", indledte Howitz i 1824 det 19. århundredes danske diskussion om viljens frihed." (Koch, Den danske idealisme, p. 183). Howitz mente, at samtidens retslærde (med Ørsted i spidsen) ikke forstod forholdet mellem menneskets normale fornuftstilstand og den afsindige tilstand, og han påbegyndte dermed en diskussion af det juridiske begreb om tilregnelighed, bag hvilket han mente at se Kants frihedslære. På flere fronter foregriber han emner, der forekommer meget moderne. For det første var hans mål, i opposition til Ørsted, at få ændret synet på domme i straffesager, hvor ydre omstændigheder burde siges at kunne svække den sagsøgtes evne til at handle fuldt rationelt, - en foregriben af moderne retspraksis.Samtidig behandler han spørgsmålet om sindssygdom som et spørgsmål om enhver anden legemlig sygdom. Han gør sig til talsmand for en biologisk funderet psykiatri, der sidestiller psykiske lidelser med fysiske lidelser ved at finde sædet for denne type sygdomme i hjernen. Ved at anse afsindighed og dermed også utilregnelighed for en indskrænkning af fornuften eller dens brug skyldet en sygdom i et af legemets organer, konkluderer han blot, at fornuftens indflydelse på den afsindiges handlinger ikke er tilstrækkelig. Ved at betragte sindslidelser som somatiske, dvs. som fysiske sygdomme placeret i hjernen, mener Howitz, at den egentlige utilregnelige eller afsindige tilstand nemt kan adskilles fra den lidenskabeligt bestemte tilstand, og de afsindige udgør ingen forskel fra den øvrige menneskeslægt, men er blot en underafdeling blandt de syge mennesker. "Manglen på fornuftig selvbestemmelse kan foreligge i grader. Med eksempler hentet fra psykiatrien kan Howitz vise, at distinktionen mellem afsindighed og tilregnelighed ikke er skarp, og at der findes en række overgangstilstande mellem normalitet og total afsindighed. Dette medfører, at den frihed, som både Ørsted og Howitz hævder er træk ved det raske og normale menneske, kan foreligge i grader, og at tilregneligheden i overensstemmelse hermed kan være større eller mindre. Når dette er tilfældet, må dommeren også inddrage overvejelser over frihedsgrader i forbindelse med strafudmåling, hvilket Ørsted jo havde benægtet." (Koch, Den danske idealisme, p. 187).Med Hume og Spinoza søger Howitz at gendrive Kants lære om menneskets frihed. Med Hume sætter han lighedstegn mellem forholdet motiv-handling og forholdet årsag-virkning, og således kan der ifølge Howitz når det gælder menneskelige handlinger, heller ikke findes noget, der er uden årsag. Howitz opfattede dog ikke, helt på linie med Hume, denne naturnødvendighed som værende i modstrid med friheden. Der er ingen tvivl om, at et skrift af en art som Howitz' "Om Afsindighed og Tilregnelse" har virket provokerende på den filosofisk idealistiske samtid, der ikke anerkendte nogen form for materialistisk determinisme, og det var nærmest en nødvendighed for at A.S. Ørsted at svare på dette provokerende skrift. Således skriver Ørsted allerede samme år "Et Par Ord; i Anledning af den foranstaaende Afhandling". Fejden, striden om viljens frihed, er nu i fuld gang, og hele det filosofiske Danmark inddrages heri. Allerede samme år svarer Howitz igen på Ørsteds svar, med sit værk "Determinismen eller Hume imod Kant". Howitz fastholder heri sine meninger fra det første indlæg, og sætter trumf på ved bl.a. at påpege, "at den kantske frihed er en videnskabelig uting, idet det må gælde for såvel den moralske som den fysiske natur, at den er underkastet love." (Koch, p. 191)"Med Howitz' 180 sider store antikritik fik striden om viljens frihed en uheldig litterær drejning og kom mere til at handle om den rette tolkning af filosofiske påstande end om den sag, der lå Howitz på hjerte. Han citerede talrige autoriteter og diskuterede indgående, hvorvidt Kants erkendelsesteori og moralfilosofi rummer indre modsigelser eller ej. Da Ørsted kort efter vendte sig imod Howitz' antikritik, fandt han rig anledning til at understrege, at Howitz' filosofiske indsigt var betydelig mindre end hans arrogance over for anderledes tænkende." (Koch, p. 191).I 1825 udgav Howitz sit sidste indlæg i fejden, "Ultimatum, angaaende Determinismen og Etatsraad Ørsteds Fortsatte Bemærkninger om samme", et skarpt og klart værk. Året efter døde han.Presentation-copy of Howitz' most important philosophical work. With his first work of 1824, "Om Afsindighed og Tilregnelse..." Howitz initiated the important 19th century Danish discussion on free will. Howitz claimed that those learned in the law (at that time led by Oersted) did not understand the relationship between the normal rational state of man and the mad state, and he thus initiated a discussion about the legal term of imputability, behind which he meant to see Kant's notion of liberty.With the thoughts of Hume, Howitz sets out to refute Kant's notion of human free will. He equals the relationship between motivation and act with the relationship between cause and effect, and thus, according to Howits, there can be no human act without cause. Like Hume, Howitz did not understand this natural necessity as being in opposition to freedom.After Howitz' first work, Oersted answers back in 1824 with his "Et Par Ord...", and after this, two other works by both follow. All three by Howitz are rare.
Address:
Silkegade 11
DK-1113 Copenhagen
Denmark
Phone:
CVR/VAT:
DK 16 89 50 16

Recently Added From Herman H. J. Lynge & Søn A/S

Anmärkiningar Om biåsestenen. (In:
More Photos
BERGIUS, PETER JONAS
Herman H. J. Lynge & Søn A/S
lyn62692
(Stockholm, 1777). 8vo. As extracted from "Kungl. Svenska vetenskapsakademiens handlingar", uncut unopened. Fine and clean. Pp. 304-309.
Defensio regia pro Carolo I. Ad Sereniss. Magnae…
More Photos
SAUMAISE; CLAUDE.
Herman H. J. Lynge & Søn A/S
lyn62707
(Leiden, Netherlands), Sumptibus Regiis, 1649. 12mo. In contemporary full calf with four raise bands and richly gilt spine. Edges of boards gilt. Previous owner's name to title-page. Worm-tract throughout, otherwise internally nice and clean. 444 pp.
Pierre Simon Laplace 1749-1827. A Determined…
More Photos
HAHN, ROGER.
Herman H. J. Lynge & Søn A/S
lyn62703
Cambridge (MA), Harvard University Press, 2005. 8vo. In the original full cloth publisher's binding with title to spine. With the original dust jacket. Ownership signature to inside of front board. Internally clean. X, (1), 310 pp.
Medicinische und philosophische Schrifften von…
More Photos
ALBERTI, MICHAEL.
Herman H. J. Lynge & Søn A/S
lyn62695
Halle im Magdeburgischen, Hendel, 1721. 8vo. In contemporary full calf with four raise bands and richly gilt spine. Traces from old paper-label to upper part of spine. Leather on spine cracked, spine-ends slightly chipped. Internally nice and clean. (14), 620, (28) pp. First collected edition of Alberti’s essays. Alberti (1682–1757), professor of medicine and philosophy at Halle and later rector of the university, was a leading disciple of Georg Ernst Stahl who considered the soul as having control on the body. Therapies involved dealing with the internal senses and feelings.
More info
Tale i Anledning af hans Kongelige Høihed…
More Photos
BUGGE, THOMAS.
Herman H. J. Lynge & Søn A/S
lyn62706
Kiøbenhavn, Møller, (1774). 8vo. In contemporary full sprinkled calf with five raised bands and gilt ornamentation to spine. Edges of boards gilt. All edges coloured in red. Old paper-label pasted on to top of spine. Head of spine chipped. Internally very nice and clean, printed on good paper. 24 pp.
O Capital. (i.e. Portuguese:
More Photos
MARX, CARLOS [KARL] (+) GABRIELLE DEVILLE (+) [Translator:] ALBANO DE MORAES.
Herman H. J. Lynge & Søn A/S
lyn62679
Lisboa, De Francisco Luiz Goncalves, 1912. 8vo. In the original red printed cloth-binding with black and white lettering. Spine with loss of the white lettering. Paper-label pasted on to lower inner margin of front board. Very light wear to extremities, Internally very fine and clean. 240 pp. The exceedingly scarce first Portuguese edition of the most important abridged version of Marx's Capital ever to have appeared, published fifty-six years before the first full Portuguese (but published in Brazil) translation and whole sixy-two years before the first full translation published in Portugal. Curiously, two translations of the present work were made 1912 but the present translation seems to have priority (see Bastien, "Readings and Translations of Karl Marx in Portugal"). After the 1933 rise of Salazar's dictatorial Estado Novo regime, suppression of the relatively newly founded Communist party grew. Members were arrested, tortured, and executed and many were sent to the Tarrafal concentration camp in the Cape Verde Islands. Communist literature suffered an equally repressive fate, hence the rarity of the present work. Marxism and especially Marxist writing caught on comparatively late in Portugal: "As for the Socialist Party - supposed to be the main expression of Marxism -, it revealed itself unable to stimulate effective theoretical and doctrinal efforts. Its existence was an example of ambiguity and inconsequence. Its political programme went on mixing Marxian elements, associationist tradition and positivist thinking. Its strategy balanced continuously between an alliance with republican politicians and the maintenance of political autonomy. Its tatics balanced between electoral abstencionism and an involvement in election processes, that never led it to a relevant position in parliament. Even its international relations showed a lasting ambiguity: it had been created according to the instructions of the Marxist majority at the Hague Congress, when most of its members tended to support political abstencionism. When the formation of the Second lnternacional was taking place in Paris in 1889 Portuguese socialists tried to join the Marxist congress, after being present at the possibilist congress. In 1920 they decided to join the Third lnternacional (what was not accomplished), at the same time that an internal reformist turn was taking place." (Bastien, "Readings and Translations of Karl Marx in Portugal"). "The epitome, here translated, was published in Paris, in 1883, by Gabriel Deville, possibly the most brilliant writer among the French Marxians. It is the most successful attempt yet made to popularize Marx's scientific economics. It is by no means free from difficulties, for the subject is essentially a complex and difficult subject, but there are no difficulties that reasonable attention and patience will not enable the average reader to overcome. There is no attempt at originality. The very words in most cases are Marx's own words, and Capital is followed so closely that the first twenty-five chapters correspond in subject and treatment with the first twenty-five chapters of Capital. Chapter XXVI corresponds in the main with Chapter XXVI of Capital, but also contains portions of chapter XXX. The last three chapters-XXVII, XXVIII, and XXIX-correspond to the last three chapters-XXXI, XXXII, and XXXIII-of Capital." (ROBERT RIVES LA MONTE, Intruductory Note to the 1899 English translation). Capital de Marx also had a Portuguese edition at this time, or better, two different editions, both in 1912, but only in translation of the survey of Book I published in France by Gabriel Deville in 1883 (Marx, 1912a and Marx, 1912b). This version omitted material dealt with in at least four chapters of the original text and was not particularly appreciated by Engels. It was a simplified text, aimed at supporting the training of socialist militants and that made it possible for them to have access, indirect, to the work of Marx. The other summaries and anthologies of Capital, which, with a purpose similar to that of Deville, circulated in Europe during this period or ignored in Portugal, as was the case with Carlo Cafiero, or were only occasionally mentioned, as was the case with Paul Lafargue and Karl Kautsky, in its French versions. OCLC list two copies, both in the US.
More info